India’s ESG Bond Revolution: Inside SEBI’s New Framework for Social, Sustainability, and Sustainability-Linked Bonds
India’s capital markets are undergoing a critical evolution. With the release of SEBI’s new Framework for ESG Debt Securities (excluding green bonds), the labelling and issuance of social, sustainability, and sustainability-linked bonds has entered a new era of regulation, integrity, and global alignment. As demand for ESG investing surges and international standards become more rigorous, India’s move signals a shift from voluntary ESG claims to verifiable financial accountability. At The Sustainability Gazette, we unpack what this framework means for issuers, investors, and reviewers, and why India’s ESG bond market is poised for transformation. From disclosure requirements to strategic opportunities, this article guides you through the essentials of the new rulebook and its potential to redefine sustainable finance in one of the world’s fastest-growing economies.
In recent years, the global financial landscape has witnessed an unmistakable shift. No longer is capital allocation driven solely by profit margins and short-term gains. Increasingly, it is being guided by environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations that reflect a deeper concern for sustainability, equity, and long-term resilience. In this context, the regulatory evolution of financial instruments like green bonds, social bonds, and sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs) has become a key focus for forward-thinking economies.
India is no exception.
On June 5, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) introduced a comprehensive Framework for ESG Debt Securities (other than green debt securities)—a landmark move designed to bolster credibility, transparency, and global alignment in India’s fast-evolving sustainable finance ecosystem.
This new framework signals India’s regulatory maturity in the ESG space. While green bonds already have an established regulatory track under SEBI’s 2017 framework (updated in 2023), this marks the first time that social bonds, sustainability bonds, and SLBs receive dedicated regulatory attention. These instruments are essential for financing not just environmental goals, but also inclusive development, gender equity, access to health and education, and broader corporate accountability.
For issuers, investors, and reviewers, this move represents a timely and strategic leap forward, paving the way for India’s domestic ESG bond market to scale up responsibly and compete with international standards.
1. Overview of SEBI’s ESG Debt Framework
The SEBI ESG Debt Framework, released via Circular SEBI/HO/DDHS/DDHS-POD-1/P/CIR/2025/84, introduces a structured set of regulatory requirements for the issuance of ESG-labelled bonds in India, excluding green bonds which are governed under a separate regime. The new framework covers three categories of instruments:
Social Bonds
Sustainability Bonds
Sustainability-Linked Bonds (SLBs)
At its core, the framework aims to eliminate "purpose-washing" and bring enhanced scrutiny to ESG-labelled instruments by making disclosure, alignment, and third-party assurance central pillars of ESG bond issuance. It sets forth obligations at each phase of the bond lifecycle—pre-issuance, post-issuance, and ongoing reporting—with tailored guidance for each instrument type.
Key Highlights of the Framework:
Eligibility and Labeling: Only those debt securities that align with globally recognized standards (e.g. ICMA Principles, Climate Bonds Standard, ASEAN standards) may be labelled as “Social,” “Sustainability,” or “SLB” bonds.
Use of Proceeds: Issuers must clearly define and justify how proceeds will be allocated. In the case of social bonds, SEBI identifies six priority categories for eligible use, including affordable infrastructure, essential services access, employment generation, food security, and socio-economic empowerment.
Mandatory Disclosures: Issuers are now required to submit detailed disclosures outlining the selection criteria, project objectives, target populations, and decision-making processes prior to issuance. For SLBs, disclosures must include sustainability strategies, KPIs, and performance targets.
Third-Party Verification: Independent third-party reviewers must be appointed both pre- and post-issuance. These reviewers are responsible for confirming alignment with recognised frameworks, verifying internal controls, and evaluating the integrity of performance-based instruments like SLBs.
Post-Issuance Transparency: Annual reporting obligations include detailed updates on the deployment of funds, progress on KPIs (for SLBs), and explanations for any unutilized proceeds.
With these provisions, SEBI is not only protecting investors and ensuring accountability, but also signaling its ambition to anchor India’s ESG debt instruments within a globally harmonized taxonomy. By distinguishing this framework from the green bond regime, SEBI acknowledges that ESG is multidimensional—and that environmental impact is only one part of the sustainable finance equation.
2. Defining the Three Pillars
India’s new ESG debt framework is centered around three distinct categories of financial instruments—Social Bonds, Sustainability Bonds, and Sustainability-Linked Bonds (SLBs). Each type has its own purpose, regulatory expectations, and impact metrics. Understanding the distinctions between them is essential for both issuers seeking compliance and investors assessing ESG integrity.
A. Social Bonds
Social bonds are debt instruments whose proceeds are exclusively applied to finance or refinance projects that deliver positive social outcomes. According to SEBI’s framework, a bond can only be labelled a “Social Bond” if it funds projects that align with globally recognized standards such as the ICMA Social Bond Principles or the Climate Bonds Initiative’s definitions.
SEBI lists six priority categories for social bond proceeds:
Affordable Basic Infrastructure Projects related to clean drinking water, sanitation, transport, and energy access for underserved communities.
Access to Essential Services This includes education, healthcare, financial services, and social housing targeted at vulnerable or excluded populations.
Employment Generation and Alleviation of Unemployment Especially through financing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) or microfinance institutions.
Food Security Programs that support sustainable agriculture, food banks, or nutritional access initiatives.
Socioeconomic Advancement and Empowerment Including support for gender equality, minority rights, disability inclusion, and other equity-oriented programs.
To label a bond as “social,” issuers must not only allocate funds to eligible categories but also demonstrate clear governance around project selection, population targeting, and performance tracking.
B. Sustainability Bonds
Sustainability bonds are hybrid instruments that combine the characteristics of both green and social bonds. Their proceeds are allocated to a mix of environmental and social projects. While the existing green bond framework under SEBI still applies to the environmental component, the new framework ensures that social allocations meet the same rigor as those in pure social bonds.
Issuers of sustainability bonds must provide transparent disclosures on:
The percentage split between green and social projects.
Justification for why the projects qualify under each pillar.
How the projects support the issuer’s broader ESG strategy.
This hybrid approach is especially valuable in sectors such as urban infrastructure, transport, or housing, where projects can deliver environmental and social benefits simultaneously.
C. Sustainability-Linked Bonds (SLBs)
Unlike the other two categories, SLBs are not tied to specific project use. Instead, they are general-purpose bonds where the financial and reputational success of the issuer is linked to their achievement of measurable ESG goals.
SEBI mandates detailed pre-issuance disclosures for SLBs, including:
Sustainability Strategy of the Issuer The overarching goals and commitments driving the issuance.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Quantifiable metrics used to measure sustainability performance (e.g. GHG intensity, gender representation, water use efficiency).
Sustainability Performance Targets (SPTs) Ambitious, time-bound goals tied to the KPIs, which trigger consequences such as coupon step-ups if not achieved.
Rationale for KPI and SPT Selection Including how these targets align with the issuer’s core business strategy and how they reflect material ESG risks.
SLBs are seen as a powerful tool to incentivize companies to embed ESG into their core operations—not just as compliance, but as performance.
3. Global Standards & Alignment
One of the defining features of SEBI’s ESG bond framework is its explicit reliance on international standards. In doing so, SEBI is positioning Indian debt markets to be globally interoperable, attractive to foreign investors, and aligned with emerging best practices in sustainable finance.
A. Recognized Global Frameworks
Issuers must ensure their bonds comply with at least one of the following widely accepted standards:
ICMA Principles (Green, Social, and Sustainability-Linked Bond Principles): These voluntary guidelines, developed by the International Capital Market Association, are the most widely adopted frameworks globally for ESG-labelled bonds. They set expectations around use of proceeds, process for project evaluation, management of proceeds, and reporting.
Climate Bonds Standard (CBS): Developed by the Climate Bonds Initiative, this standard includes sector-specific criteria and science-based thresholds, particularly relevant for projects linked to climate mitigation and resilience.
ASEAN Standards: For issuers targeting Southeast Asian investors, the ASEAN Capital Markets Forum provides social and green bond standards aligned with ICMA but tailored to regional needs.
EU Green Bond Standard & EU Taxonomy: While not legally binding in India, these EU frameworks are gaining global traction and serve as reference points for defining environmentally sustainable activities and credible sustainability claims.
B. Alignment Mechanisms in the SEBI Framework
SEBI’s framework does not attempt to reinvent ESG definitions but instead builds an alignment-based compliance model. This means:
No SEBI-Only Definitions: A social or SLB label is valid only if the bond aligns with one or more recognized global frameworks.
Third-Party Reviewers Must Reference Standards: Third-party reviewers must confirm and document that the issuer’s disclosures, project definitions, and KPIs meet the expectations set by global principles.
Market Harmonization: This approach makes Indian ESG bonds more easily accepted by international investors and ensures transparency across borders, especially as ESG regulations continue to evolve in jurisdictions like the EU, US, and Singapore.
By emphasizing global harmonization, SEBI is strengthening India’s ability to attract ESG capital, improve reporting comparability, and avoid fragmentation in sustainable finance.
4. Pre-Issuance Disclosure Requirements
A key innovation in SEBI’s ESG debt framework is the mandatory set of pre-issuance disclosures for ESG-labelled bonds. These are designed to ensure that investors and regulators fully understand a bond’s intended impact, structure, and credibility from the outset. By shifting from voluntary to compulsory disclosure, SEBI aims to curb mislabelling, strengthen investor trust, and improve market scrutiny.
For social and sustainability bonds, issuers must clearly outline the project’s objectives, the issue it addresses, and the population that will benefit. SEBI highlights the importance of specifying the target population, such as low-income households, unemployed youth, or women entrepreneurs, along with the measurable social value expected.
Issuers must also explain their internal project selection process, including governance structures, screening criteria, and any impact assessments used. This promotes transparency in how eligible projects are chosen and validated.
Another requirement is to describe how funds will be tracked and monitored. Issuers must identify the tools and systems they will use to ensure proper use of proceeds—whether internal controls, audit mechanisms, or third-party oversight.
For sustainability-linked bonds (SLBs), the emphasis shifts to performance. Issuers must disclose their sustainability strategy, relevant Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), and Sustainability Performance Targets (SPTs). These must be material, time-bound, and clearly aligned with business goals. Issuers must also explain why specific KPIs and SPTs were selected and how ambitious they are compared to sector benchmarks.
Importantly, issuers must name the third-party reviewers they intend to appoint. These independent reviewers will later verify alignment with recognised international frameworks. Pre-issuance disclosure templates are provided in Annexure A (for social and sustainability bonds) and Annexure B (for SLBs).
Altogether, these requirements reflect a shift from marketing-driven ESG claims to structured, verifiable information that supports informed investment decisions from day one.
5. Post-Issuance Transparency and Reporting
SEBI’s ESG framework extends transparency beyond the point of issuance, with clear post-issuance reporting requirements to ensure long-term accountability. These disclosures are crucial to preserving trust in the ESG bond market and ensuring that initial commitments are fully honored.
For social bonds, issuers must report annually on how proceeds are used. This includes amounts allocated, funded projects, and consistency with the original disclosures. If any proceeds remain unutilized, issuers must explain why, how they are being held, and when they will be deployed.
Issuers are also expected to provide progress updates on social outcomes, such as the number of clinics built or beneficiaries reached. While full impact evaluations are not required annually, these updates offer insight into whether the promised social value is being delivered.
For sustainability-linked bonds, annual reports must track performance against KPIs and SPTs. This is the true test of the bond’s credibility. If targets are missed, the bond’s structure may trigger financial penalties, such as a step-up in coupon rates.
To ensure objectivity, SEBI requires the use of third-party reviewers post-issuance. These reviewers verify whether proceeds were used as planned, confirm internal controls, and assess KPI achievement in SLBs.
These requirements turn ESG bonds into a process of ongoing accountability, moving beyond good intentions to demonstrable results. SEBI’s emphasis on long-term transparency is a safeguard against ESG dilution and a signal of regulatory seriousness.
6. Third-Party Assurance and Certification
A cornerstone of SEBI’s ESG bond framework is the requirement for independent third-party review before and after issuance. This is key to preventing greenwashing or social-washing and ensures that ESG claims are verifiable, not just aspirational.
Before issuance, issuers must appoint a qualified reviewer to confirm the bond’s alignment with recognised global standards and assess the integrity of disclosures. For social and sustainability bonds, reviewers check whether the projects, use of proceeds, and governance mechanisms comply with international best practices. They also examine tracking systems to ensure proper fund use and reporting.
For sustainability-linked bonds, reviewers evaluate the materiality and robustness of KPIs and the ambition of the associated SPTs. These experts assess whether the chosen indicators are core to the issuer’s strategy and whether the targets reflect meaningful ESG progress.
Post-issuance, reviewers continue to play a vital role. They verify how proceeds were deployed, check impact disclosures, and assess whether SLB targets were met. In some cases, this includes examining internal tools, staff interviews, or auditing documentation. SEBI does not provide a fixed list of eligible reviewers but expects them to be independent, experienced, and credible. These may include ESG rating agencies or sustainability-focused consultancies.
By embedding third-party assurance throughout the bond lifecycle, SEBI strengthens market confidence. Credibility is no longer dependent on issuer reputation alone, but on external validation grounded in ESG expertise and transparency.
7. Accountability: Preventing Purpose-Washing
As ESG markets expand, concerns about purpose-washing, where bonds are marketed as sustainable but lack real impact, have grown. SEBI’s framework addresses this risk by embedding accountability throughout the bond lifecycle.
Issuers must align their projects or targets with established global standards, not self-defined labels. Independent reviewers are tasked with validating this alignment, reducing the risk of inflated or misleading ESG claims. Governance expectations are also clear. Issuers must track and document fund use, explain delays or deviations, and report on unutilized proceeds. Annual updates must include how unused funds are held and plans for deployment. This ensures continuous transparency.
In the case of sustainability-linked bonds, missed targets may trigger financial penalties such as coupon step-ups. This creates tangible incentives to meet ESG goals and reinforces their importance in the bond’s structure. SEBI has also strengthened disclosure obligations. Misstating ESG progress or failing to meet commitments can lead to regulatory action and reputational harm under applicable securities laws.
Altogether, SEBI is shifting ESG finance from a trust-based model to one grounded in evidence, transparency, and enforceable standards. This not only protects investors but also ensures that funds are channelled toward projects that deliver measurable societal and environmental value.
8. Market Implications and Strategic Opportunities
SEBI’s ESG bond framework is more than a regulatory update — it marks a strategic pivot in India’s financial ecosystem, positioning ESG-labelled debt as a credible vehicle for sustainable development financing.
For issuers, the framework offers a clear, standards-aligned route to raise funds for social and environmental goals while enhancing market credibility. By complying with international disclosure norms, Indian firms can attract ESG-focused capital and strengthen their appeal to global investors. This is especially valuable for companies seeking to scale internationally. Public sector bodies and infrastructure projects also stand to benefit. Initiatives like affordable housing, rural health, and education can now tap into social bond markets with stronger investor confidence, thanks to the framework’s transparency and integrity.
For investors, SEBI’s rules reduce uncertainty and increase comparability. Rigorous disclosures and mandatory third-party reviews help them better assess risks and impacts. Pension funds, insurers, and sovereign funds are more likely to participate, knowing ESG claims are backed by verifiable data.
Importantly, the framework includes flexibility for SMEs. Issuers listed on SME exchanges may file post-issuance reports semi-annually instead of annually, balancing accountability with resource realities.
At the market level, the framework catalyzes growth in India’s sustainable finance ecosystem. It encourages new ESG-linked products, supports the rise of verifiers and rating agencies, and aligns domestic regulation with global best practices, a move that enhances India’s competitiveness and financial resilience.
9. Challenges and Next Steps
SEBI’s ESG bond framework is a major step forward, but its success hinges on effective implementation, coordination, and continuous support.
A key challenge is issuer readiness. Many Indian firms, especially mid-cap and SMEs, lack ESG expertise and may struggle with identifying eligible projects or designing robust KPIs. Targeted capacity-building programs and technical guidance will be essential to help them comply confidently.
Data availability and quality pose another hurdle. ESG-related data in India is often fragmented. Accurate reporting and third-party verification require stronger data systems, which may demand new tools and internal investments. Regulatory alignment is also critical. SEBI’s framework intersects with parallel efforts by the RBI, MCA, and IFSCA. Harmonizing these initiatives is vital to prevent overlap and reduce regulatory fatigue for issuers.
The ecosystem of third-party reviewers must expand to meet demand. Ensuring their credibility, independence, and technical skills, along with clear accreditation standards, is essential to build market trust. Further SEBI guidance could ease implementation. Clarifications on KPI materiality, examples of credible SPTs, or real-case templates would help the market mature faster.
Finally, ongoing stakeholder engagement will be vital. Open dialogue, feedback loops, and periodic reviews will keep the framework responsive and relevant.
In Summary
India’s new ESG bond framework is a turning point for sustainable finance. By setting clear standards for social, sustainability, and sustainability-linked bonds, SEBI has closed a regulatory gap and laid the foundation for trust, transparency, and credible ESG impact.
This is more than a rulebook. It embeds a culture of accountability and global alignment, giving issuers access to new capital while holding them to higher ESG standards. It also equips investors with the tools to better assess risk and impact, placing India firmly in the global sustainable finance conversation.
Challenges remain, from ensuring robust disclosures to scaling third-party verification, but the direction is clear. Sustainability is no longer optional; it is becoming a core investment principle.
If embraced with commitment by regulators, businesses, and investors alike, this framework could transform capital markets in India and inspire other emerging economies to follow suit.
If your business operates in India or plans to issue ESG-labelled debt, and you need guidance on framework alignment, pre- or post-issuance disclosures, sustainability-linked KPIs, or staff training, reach out to us. The ESG Institute is here to support your journey toward full alignment with SEBI’s ESG bond regulations and global best practices.
At The ESG Institute, we equip professionals and organizations to lead in this evolving landscape. Our Diploma in ESG Strategy empowers decision-makers with the knowledge and tools to integrate ESG principles into core business strategy. For those focused on sustainable finance, our Diploma in Sustainable Finance provides a deep dive into green financial instruments, risk frameworks, impact investing, and the evolving regulatory environment.
Learn more and enrol: www.the-esg-institute.org/training
Leveraging a global network of over 500 experts, The ESG Institute is a leading authority in integrating Sustainability and Environment1al, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles into business strategies to drive meaningful change. With a focus on innovation and practicality, The ESG Institute provides a comprehensive suite of services, including ESG training, consulting, and certification programs. By equipping organizations with the knowledge and tools to meet evolving sustainability standards, The ESG Institute enables businesses to not only achieve compliance but also create long-term value. Its mission is to transform businesses into agents of positive change, fostering a more sustainable, equitable, and resilient global economy. For more information, visit our site.
