Sustainable Food Sector: Regulation, Risk, and Opportunity
The food sector has become one of the most influential architects in the sustainability transition. Few industries are so deeply embedded in everyday life while simultaneously shaping global environmental and social outcomes. Food determines not only what we eat, but how land is used, how water is consumed, how people work, and how supply chains stretch across continents.
From farms and fisheries to factories, logistics hubs and supermarket shelves, food systems form one of the most complex value chains in the global economy. According to international estimates, they account for nearly one third of global greenhouse gas emissions, use around 70% of freshwater withdrawals, and occupy over half of the world's habitable land. At the same time, up to one fifth of all food produced is lost or wasted before it ever reaches consumers.
Against this backdrop, ESG reporting in the food sector goes far beyond compliance. Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), food companies are facing a moment of truth. They sit at the crossroads of regulatory pressure, investor scrutiny and rapidly changing consumer expectations. Yet this also places them in a uniquely strong position: few sectors have such a direct ability to generate measurable, real-world sustainability improvements.
In this issue, Renata Zielińska, Senior Sustainability Advisor at The ESG Institute, breaks down why ESG reporting in the food sector is now essential, the practical steps companies are taking to move beyond compliance, and what it means for competitive advantage in a rapidly changing regulatory landscape.
Why Sustainability in the Food Sector Is Crucial
Environmental Footprint and Regulatory Exposure
The environmental impact of the food sector is broad, deep and often underestimated. Emissions are generated not only by manufacturing plants or transport fleets, but already at the agricultural stage — through fertiliser use, livestock emissions, land-use change and energy-intensive irrigation. Processing, refrigeration, packaging and distribution add further layers of complexity.
From an ESG perspective, this translates directly into the core environmental standards of ESRS E1–E5. Food companies must now disclose detailed information on climate change mitigation and adaptation, pollution, water and marine resources, biodiversity, and resource use and circular economy.
One of the most challenging aspects is the requirement to report Scope 3 emissions. For many food businesses, upstream agricultural production and downstream logistics account for the vast majority of their carbon footprint. This forces companies to engage with farmers, cooperatives, ingredient suppliers and transport providers in ways that were previously considered optional.
Regulatory exposure is increasing rapidly. The European Green Deal, Fit for 55 package, taxonomy regulation and upcoming rules on deforestation-free supply chains are transforming sustainability from a strategic ambition into a legal obligation. Companies that fail to adapt risk not only fines and reporting non-compliance, but also exclusion from financing, procurement contracts and retail partnerships.
This regulatory momentum is not confined to Europe. The SEC's proposed climate disclosure rules in the US (expected to take effect in 2025) require large companies to report Scope 1 and 2 emissions, with Scope 3 phased in later. The UK mandates TCFD-aligned climate reporting for large companies. China has made Scope 3 emissions disclosure mandatory at stock exchange level. Australia's Climate-Related Disclosure Standards, which take effect in 2025, follow a similar playbook. Canada is advancing its own disclosure framework. Southeast Asian regulators are establishing requirements in jurisdictions including Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. For food companies with international operations, this patchwork of regulations creates both complexity and opportunity. Companies that build integrated ESG systems now will be positioned to comply across multiple jurisdictions simultaneously.
Example: Nestlé turns climate ambition into action.Nestlé has committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2050, with a strong focus on its agricultural supply chain. Through its "Net Zero Roadmap", the company works directly with farmers to reduce emissions, promote regenerative agriculture and improve soil health. These efforts not only lower environmental impact but also strengthen long-term supply security and resilience.
Social Responsibility Across Complex Supply Chains
The food sector is one of the world's largest employers. It relies heavily on seasonal workers, migrant labour and small-scale producers, often operating in regions with limited regulatory oversight. This creates heightened social risks and heightened reporting expectations.
Under ESRS S1–S4, companies are expected to look far beyond their own factories or offices. Issues such as fair wages, working hours, occupational health and safety, freedom of association and access to grievance mechanisms must be assessed across the entire value chain.
For food companies, this often means addressing uncomfortable questions. Are agricultural workers paid living wages? Are recruitment practices ethical? Do suppliers respect basic human rights standards? And how transparent is the system for identifying and addressing violations?
Importantly, social sustainability in the food sector is also closely linked to product responsibility. Food safety, nutritional value, transparent labelling and responsible marketing increasingly fall under the ESG umbrella. Consumers, regulators and NGOs expect companies to demonstrate that sustainability does not stop at environmental metrics, but extends to human wellbeing.
Example: Danone positions social responsibility at the centre. Through its "One Planet. One Health" vision, Danone integrates fair sourcing practices, employee wellbeing and community engagement into its business model. Danone was also one of the first multinationals to adopt B Corp certification for a large part of its global operations, sending a strong signal to both consumers and investors.
Market Pressure and Shifting Expectations
Perhaps the most dynamic driver of change comes from the market itself. Sustainability has become a core element of brand value in the food sector. Consumers are more aware than ever of where their food comes from, how it is produced and what impact it has.
Low-carbon products, plant-based alternatives, local sourcing and sustainable packaging are no longer niche trends. They have become mainstream expectations. At the same time, food waste reduction and transparency around supply chains are emerging as key differentiators.
Retailers play a critical role in this transformation. Large chains increasingly require their suppliers to provide detailed ESG data, carbon footprints and compliance declarations. For many food producers, the driver of ESG reporting has shifted from regulators to customers. Without credible sustainability data, access to shelf space itself may be at risk.
Example: Tesco cuts food waste through data.Tesco has pioneered food waste transparency. By publicly reporting food waste data and working closely with suppliers to improve forecasting and logistics, the retailer has significantly reduced waste across its operations. The initiative not only lowered emissions and costs, but also strengthened Tesco's reputation as a responsible market leader.
How to Move to a Higher Level of Sustainable Development
Double Materiality as the Foundation
At the heart of ESRS reporting lies the principle of double materiality. Companies must assess both how sustainability issues impact their financial performance and how their activities impact people and the environment.
In the food sector, double materiality assessments consistently highlight a similar set of critical topics: greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption, food losses and waste, working conditions in the supply chain, packaging, and biodiversity impacts.
A well-executed double materiality process is not a compliance exercise. It is a strategic tool that helps companies prioritise actions, allocate resources and align sustainability initiatives with business objectives. For food companies, it also creates a shared language between sustainability teams, finance departments and operational managers.
Digitalisation and Carbon Footprint Monitoring
Without digital tools, meeting ESRS requirements is practically impossible. Food value chains generate vast amounts of data across multiple actors and geographies. Manual data collection quickly becomes inefficient, inconsistent and unreliable.
Advanced digital platforms allow companies to track energy use, emissions, water consumption and waste in near real time. They also enable supplier engagement, scenario analysis and progress monitoring against climate targets.
Carbon footprinting, in particular, has become a strategic capability. Companies that can accurately measure and manage Scope 1–3 emissions are better positioned to set credible reduction targets, respond to investor questions and comply with future carbon pricing mechanisms.
Example: Unilever scales sustainability through data.Unilever uses advanced digital tools to monitor environmental and social performance across thousands of suppliers worldwide. By integrating sustainability metrics into procurement decisions, the company ensures that ESG considerations directly influence how and where products are sourced. This approach has helped Unilever reduce emissions, improve transparency and strengthen supplier relationships.
Food Waste Reduction as a Strategic Win
Few sustainability actions offer as many benefits as reducing food losses and waste. From an environmental perspective, wasted food represents wasted land, water, energy and emissions. From a business perspective, it is simply lost value.
Under ESRS E5, companies are required to report on waste generation and management, including food waste. Leading organisations are going beyond reporting and embedding waste reduction into operational excellence programmes.
Better demand forecasting, improved storage conditions, smarter packaging and collaboration with food banks or secondary markets can significantly reduce losses. Importantly, these measures often deliver quick financial returns, making food waste reduction one of the rare ESG initiatives that almost always pays for itself.
Example: Carrefour thinks circular.Carrefour has introduced multiple initiatives to combat food waste, including selling "imperfect" produce, dynamic pricing for near-expiry products and donations of unsold food. These actions reduce environmental impact while resonating strongly with consumers who value authenticity and responsibility.
Packaging Transformation and Regulatory Readiness
Packaging has become one of the most visible sustainability challenges in the food sector. Consumers notice it immediately, regulators scrutinise it closely, and NGOs actively campaign around it.
The upcoming Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR), taking effect on August 12, 2026,will fundamentally reshape packaging strategies. Reduced plastic use, higher recycled content requirements and a shift towards reusable or compostable solutions are no longer optional.
For food companies, this means balancing sustainability goals with food safety, shelf life and cost considerations. Those that invest early in packaging innovation will be better prepared for regulatory changes and less exposed to sudden compliance costs.
Example: Coca-Cola HBC closes the packaging loop.Coca-Cola HBC has invested heavily in increasing recycled content and expanding returnable packaging systems. By combining regulatory readiness with consumer-friendly solutions, the company positions packaging not as a problem, but as part of the solution.
Sustainable Agriculture and Supply Chain Transformation
True sustainability in the food sector begins long before processing or packaging. It starts on the farm. Supporting suppliers in adopting regenerative agriculture practices, reducing fertiliser use, improving soil health and protecting biodiversity has a direct and measurable impact on ESG performance.
Many food companies are now moving from transactional supplier relationships to long-term partnerships. Training programmes, financial incentives and shared data platforms help farmers transition towards more sustainable practices while maintaining productivity.
Certification schemes, traceability systems and satellite monitoring are increasingly used to verify sustainability claims and meet reporting requirements. While these initiatives require investment, they also strengthen supply chain resilience in the face of climate change and resource scarcity. For those interested in receiving The ESG Institute Certified Sustainable Business accreditation, please visit: https://www.the-esg-institute.org/sustainable-business
From Reporting Obligation to Strategic Advantage
Sustainability in the food industry has moved far beyond being an add-on, a marketing story or a compliance exercise. Under CSRD and ESRS, it has become a central element of corporate strategy, risk management and value creation.
Companies that approach ESG reporting as an opportunity rather than a burden will be better prepared for regulatory change, more attractive to investors and more trusted by consumers. In a sector that quite literally feeds the world, the ability to combine profitability with responsibility is not just desirable. It is essential.
The future of the food sector will be shaped by those who understand that sustainability is not a destination, but a continuous process of improvement. And ESG reporting, when done well, is one of its most powerful tools.
Stay Ahead of the ESG Curve
At The ESG Institute, we empower professionals and organisations to navigate the world's evolving sustainability regulations with clarity and confidence. From ESG reporting frameworks and governance, to carbon markets, sustainable finance, and enterprise risk management, our accredited online programmes and advisory services are designed to turn compliance into opportunity.
Our programmes span ESG strategy, sustainability reporting, carbon markets, climate law, sustainable finance, CSRD compliance, and more, equipping professionals with the practical tools to translate materiality into the kind of decision-ready outputs that boards, investors, and finance teams can act on.
Explore our globally recognised diplomas and certificates, all fully online and CPD-accredited.
Learn more at www.the-esg-institute.org/training and join a growing community of over 16,000 sustainability alumni shaping a better future.
For personalized guidance on integrating sustainability into your business operations, reach out to The ESG Institute. Our experts are here to help you navigate the complexities of ESG implementation and drive meaningful change.
